Amazon, the world’s largest online bookseller, is once again at the center of controversy. Screenshots from the Kindle store reveal a disturbing anomaly: a book about the “Shooting of Charlie Kirk” at Utah Valley University has been listed for publication before the event itself allegedly took place.
In the listing, The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America’s Response by Anastasia J. Casey shows a publication date of September 9, 2025. Yet the book’s description claims to document an attack on campus during a Charlie Kirk speaking event on September 10, 2025 , a date that had not yet occurred at the time of publication.
The inconsistency is glaring:
The Kindle edition shows a publication date of September 9, 2025.
The hardcover edition is listed as publishing on September 11, 2025.
The book synopsis describes events as though they have already happened, including detailed reporting on the “aftermath,” “first responders,” and “community response.”
A Pattern of Preemptive Publishing
This is not the first time Amazon has faced scrutiny for books appearing to document tragedies before they happen. Researchers and watchdogs have flagged similar anomalies in past incidents, where books or “instant histories” appeared on the marketplace suspiciously early, sometimes within hours of breaking news, and occasionally even before the reported events.
Critics argue this phenomenon raises serious questions:
Are these predictive programming efforts? Some suggest these books are part of a psychological conditioning strategy, normalizing or even foreshadowing tragic events.
Are AI-generated manuscripts to blame? With the rise of automated writing tools, opportunists can churn out “instant” books in anticipation of viral events, sometimes relying on rumors, leaks, or speculative content.
Or is this an inside track? The possibility that individuals with foreknowledge of staged events are using Amazon’s self-publishing platform to seed narratives in advance cannot be ignored.
Why It Matters
Publishing a detailed “account” of an event before it occurs undermines trust in both journalism and public safety. If books can describe shootings, attacks, or disasters days in advance, it suggests either gross negligence in Amazon’s content moderation, or something far more sinister.
For communities, families, and individuals affected by these tragedies, the existence of such pre-published accounts adds insult to injury, making it appear as though human suffering is being scripted, commodified, and sold before the dust even settles.
Amazon’s Responsibility
As the gatekeeper of the largest digital bookstore in the world, Amazon bears responsibility for ensuring that works sold on its platform do not exploit tragedy or manipulate public perception. The company has repeatedly defended its self-publishing policies as open and accessible, but this openness has created fertile ground for abuse.
When books about events that have not yet occurred are available for sale , complete with eyewitness-style descriptions and “aftermath” analysis , it signals either a dangerous failure of oversight or deliberate complicity.
Conclusion
The case of The Shooting of Charlie Kirk should sound alarms well beyond the publishing world. It forces us to ask difficult questions: Who writes these books? How do they know what they claim to know? And why does Amazon continue to publish them without accountability?
Until those questions are answered, one truth remains clear: the line between reality and narrative is being blurred in ways that threaten public trust - and perhaps even public safety.
I can't find this exact same book on their site. Another one was published today, a day after the shooting. How is that possible since when you self-publish it takes 48 to 72 hours to be processed and available to the public. A kindle version can be available immediately but those books are paperback. Maybe Amazon is trying to make profit by AI generating books and authors names... To Be Continued...
Maybe the Simpsons were onto something.